Interview Process: I went through an extensive 8-week interview process with Inkitt, which included multiple rounds of video interviews, technical assessments, a presentation of a case study, a cultural team check, and finally, an on-site closing round at their San Francisco office. While the initial stages of the interview were handled well, the process became increasingly frustrating. Onsite Experience: Inkitt flew me out to their SF office for a final on-site interview. I was told that the objective of the on-site visit was for candidates to see the office environment and to feel comfortable before accepting an offer. Basically, the decision about my candidacy should have been made earlier from the company’s standpoint. The team members I met were friendly. However, despite being told that everything was looking great and they were just waiting for confirmation to extend an offer, I experienced delays in communication. Eventually, I was informed that the company decided to move forward with another candidate. Decision-Making Process: I observed that the CEO wants to run and involve himself in every decision, which might be a significant red flag for internal processes. While this is somewhat understandable for a growth-stage startup, it seems that people within the company don't appreciate his micromanagement leadership style. Expense Reimbursement: Their lack of consideration for candidate expenses, including airport transportation and lunch for a half-day onsite interview, needs to be improved. I had to cover approximately $150 in expenses out of pocket without receiving an offer. This might be acceptable for the chances of getting hired, but not when the outcome is negative. Overall Impression: The lengthy interview process and the false positive signals given to candidates is not ideal. Advice to Management: Keep the interview process shorter than 6 weeks. The cultural fit (WHO) session is unnecessary and overly subjective. Reconsider onsite invitations if you are on a limited budget. Ensure clear communication and provide clear feedback to candidates who make it to the final rounds.

Terrible phone screening. They started the conversation by asking "You left your previous employer. Why was that?" There were long silences and a constant unfriendly atmosphere as if the interviewer was waiting for me to conduct the call. They asked nonsensical questions like "mention 5 KPIs that you have worked with", without any context. Finally, in the end, they ask me to email them the full name of my 5 most recent managers, and only after would they tell me the next step of the recruiting process. After reading the reviews of this company, I regret even having accepted to do this interview.