↳
Ok I figured. I'm waiting for results too so it made me wonder when I saw this. Thanks. Moins
↳
Posted right after the interview. Should have clarified.
↳
Have you already gotten notified of 'no offer' or did you post this right after the interview on July 7? Moins
↳
I answered the questions concerning the photos to the best of my ability considering the tiny size and generally poor lighting in the photos. Interpretation of photos of features or pieces of equipment are not the way you do a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment site walk. You go into the site and see the pieces of equipment yourself where you will be able to identify them in context. You will also be able to touch, smell and hear when you are in the field doing the site walk. An example of the inappropriateness of this technique is a dark and tiny photo used of a round dark brown cover atop a concrete pad outdoors next to a building with what looks like possible stains near the cover and other objects with the question "is this significant?". This is not an adequate way to determine if the applicant can identify a Recognized Environmental Condition. The apparent stains could be water from a recent rain. I answered "yes" to be on the safe side because I could not get close to the objects to tell if they were stained from any substance other than water. It was just a photo. Moins
↳
Technical competence, client relationships and ability to work with others
↳
The test questions were around basic logic and math. Not difficult, just very odd. I've been to dozens of interviews over the past 20 years and I've never experienced anything like this. Moins
↳
I focused on what I expected for salary in my response.
↳
I discussed how I completed a M.S. degree on the effects of storms on Oregon Inlet, NC. The thesis included a GIS database 1846-1996 showing that the frequency of coastal storms increases the width of the inlet. The impact of erosion on the Outer Banks community and tourism industry. Moins