Avantages
Some truly talented and hardworking individuals (no longer around) were part of the team, and the work had potential to be impactful. Decent office perks and flexibility (also no longer available).
Inconvénients
The company is facing significant challenges with leadership credibility. Decision-making at the top often appears insular and disconnected from the broader team, with a strong emphasis on personal preferences rather than collective, strategic goals. This has contributed to a top-down culture where alternative perspectives are often discouraged. One particularly concerning decision was the appointment of a senior executive with close personal ties to the CEO, despite questions around relevant experience for the role. This move impacted internal morale and contributed to the departure of several highly capable team members. The overall environment feels increasingly driven by internal dynamics rather than merit, which can be discouraging for those hoping to make a meaningful impact. Despite many years in operation and multiple reorganizations, the company is still not profitable. Leadership appears to be scrambling in response, setting increasingly unrealistic goals and often taking a reactive approach to challenges, rather than addressing root issues head-on. Unfortunately, the current leadership team has not demonstrated the capability to guide the company toward sustainable growth or cultural stability.