Bad management, bad tech, amazing benefits - Avis employé Senior Data Scientist Fannie Mae

3,0
23 janv. 2024
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Benefits are extremely generous - excellent 401k matching, lifestyle spending account that can be used for almost anything, many extra days off. Salaries are very competitive for the industry. The people who complain most have delusions of working for top-tier tech companies. Easy to impress people if you're competent. An excellent place to cruise until retirement. Most of the time work life balance is very good.

Inconvénients

Everything at FNMA is about appearances with no concern for function: 1. Managers prioritize sexy projects with questionable value rather than making sure their core products don't fall apart. 2. Cybersecurity is mostly theater and requires insane workarounds with chains of virtual machines that often break and are extremely slow when they do work. 3. Upper management's solution to everything is to create additional bureaucracy that covers things that were already covered. 4. Documentation usually exists, but it is designed by and for technically incompetent audiences. It's also stored on random confluence pages that aren't kept to date.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Fannie Mae

5,0
25 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

benefits, pay, work life balance

Inconvénients

no cons to be honest

3,0
5 juil. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I had thought I’d stay there until retirement. Pay was pretty good and while upward mobility was limited there was an open environment for learning and getting involved in new things. The company was socially conscious with volunteer time available. Flex schedules were available with manager approval and that helped us effectively implement work from home in 2020. We did work a lot of long hours to get projects done but the work seemed to be appreciated and rewarded.

Inconvénients

For a company that had been highly profitable, Bill Pulte came in and started demanding changes for the company to be run more like one on the verge of bankruptcy. Managers were forced to spend significant time managing attendance and schedules and constantly justifying staffing just to have that ignored anyway. Anybody below a Director was cut completely out of these decisions meaning managers would show up to meetings to find the no-shows had been let go with no warning. You just started to see on people’s faces they were miserable, many long time associates quietly hoping they’d be included in the next round of cuts. It’s too bad, a company I had thought I’d retire with really just became toxic.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout