employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

International Rescue Committee

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

Great place with a great mission - Avis employé Inventory Specialist International Rescue Committee

4,0
14 juil. 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- amazing team culture, everyone was there to work hard and with the right purpose and intention to serve the Clients - contributes to deep interpersonal growth as it is incredibly diverse groups from Staff to Clients - each day was unique and challenging - Management was genuinely there to support Staff and step in to any role when needed, and encouraged a positve and successful shift.

Inconvénients

- changed Insurance provider and poorly impacted MANY staff needs (seemed like a decision made to benefit the organization, not the Staff) - limited pay and lacked opportunities for a raise - certain departments can be limiting to career growth, unless willing to relocate

Découvrez plus d’avis sur International Rescue Committee

5,0
24 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Very valuable insights in conducting work. Provides valuable input.

Inconvénients

None that I can think of.

2,0
22 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Inconvénients

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

3
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout