They have lost their way - Avis employé Principal Systems Engineer LinQuest

3,0
10 sept. 2013
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good, smart people and the pay is very good. LinQuest is like a Ferrari when it comes to the brain power there. No other company has such a high concentration of advanced degrees and leaders in their field.

Inconvénients

LinQuest does not use the talent they have. They are too reliant on government contracts (all eggs in one basket) during this time of defense spending cuts. In the early days they used to be go-getters and risk takers. They tried to reach out for challenges since they were growing. Now, it's more of the hunker down and protect the billable hours.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur LinQuest

5,0
5 nov. 2025
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good benefits, flexible time, good management, strong pipeline

Inconvénients

no notable cons to list

2,0
2 sept. 2025
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- The direct manager was highly professional, supportive, and respectful. - The recent acquisition by KBR offers hope for improved structure, culture, and leadership standards across the company. - LinQuest has some talented and experienced engineers who are passionate about their work.

Inconvénients

- The team I worked with operated under a structure that lacked proper oversight and accountability. - A key team lead had been given authority despite having no leadership training, and limited professional experience. This individual started in a regular role and, within a few years, was placed in a position to lead a team of highly experienced senior and principal engineers. - The leadership approach relied on outdated, micromanagement-style practices, with little understanding of technical complexity and minimal ability to provide meaningful guidance. - Communication from this team lead was often unprofessional—rude, dismissive, and lacking respect for the expertise of the engineering staff—which significantly impacted team morale. - Employees were noticeably unmotivated; meetings were silent, with little to no collaboration or engagement. The environment felt tense and discouraging. - Team members were frequently placed under unnecessary pressure, and concerns raised were not welcomed. In some cases, individuals who spoke up faced subtle forms of retaliation. - There seemed to be a lack of understanding—or a disregard—for basic workplace conduct standards, including respectful communication practices. - The leadership structure appeared to prioritize internal politics over merit, qualifications, and professional conduct, raising serious concerns about long-term growth and employee retention.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout