employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MST Insurance Solutions

Est-ce votre entreprise ?

High turnover, very disorganized - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) MST Insurance Solutions

1,0
18 sept. 2023
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Health plan, hybrid work, good office location

Inconvénients

Very high turnover within employee and management level, many people quit within or at the year mark. High workload to make up for people leaving year round. Team is highly disorganized due to the turnover. You will not be compensated for your work (very minimal raises and no promotions) at review season as management support is nonexistent. Favoritism is obvious and not well hidden. Promotions are not merit based and opportunities to move up are scarce unless based on favoritism. No bonus as a company standard. Heavy Japanese work culture. I would highly recommend you reach out to past or current employees to do more research into this company before you join.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur MST Insurance Solutions

4,0
13 mars 2024
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- The company culture is very up-beat and everyone is very open to support one another during busy times! - Remote-Hybrid work - Amazing hands-on training. Not only do you have typical courses, but management takes time to sit down with you and go over your day-to-day strategy and will make recommendations based on their experience. You are not left in the dark!

Inconvénients

- Lots of touch-base calls with management can seem like a micromanaged workforce, BUT if you lead the conversation, are open and transparent and you look at every interaction as a learning opportunity - this is not necessarily a con!

1,0
19 avr. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Remote Work and salary was decent

Inconvénients

I had a very disappointing experience with this company, largely due to how upper management operates. From the start, expectations were unclear and constantly shifting, making it extremely difficult to succeed. There was little to no structured onboarding or support, yet performance expectations were high and often unrealistic. What was most concerning was being placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) just two months into the role—with no prior formal warnings, coaching, or documented performance concerns. The PIP itself felt less like a genuine opportunity to improve and more like a formality. That impression was confirmed when I was terminated just six days after being placed on it, despite making immediate efforts to address the feedback. In addition, there appeared to be consistent turnover within the Chicago employee benefits team during my time there, which raised concerns about leadership stability and overall team support. This experience felt less like performance management and more like being set up for failure. A company should invest in its employees, provide clear expectations, and allow reasonable time for improvement. Unfortunately, that was not the case here. I would strongly encourage leadership to reevaluate how they onboard, support, and manage new employees. The current approach creates a high-risk environment for employees and reflects poorly on the organization’s culture and leadership practices.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout