Avantages
Very supportive managers and a fun, highly collaborative team. The department fosters an environment where ideas are openly shared and opportunities for improvement are discussed constructively without toxicity. Truly the best company I’ve worked for so far.
Inconvénients
The interview process was somewhat lengthy, and salary discussions were not entirely consistent.
Avantages
I am very excited to be part of a strategic and visionary team. Its a very collaborative environment. I feel my input is valued. It really feels like the employees care about the company and that management cares about the staff. Senior management has been excellent on communications to the entire team on an ongoing basis. The onboarding experience was good as they provide team members that you can easily reach out to with further questions or for help. Plus I love working for company that people like the product!
Inconvénients
There's a lot of tools that we have access to use but they are tools that I have used often. And the ones that have been new to me, usually have been pretty intuitive to learn and use.
Avantages
Had some great coworkers during my time at MWB/TD, manager was always very encouraging, and pay was good
Inconvénients
Outdated technology stack. The platform is built on legacy foundations, and modernization efforts haven't kept pace with the market. Leadership lacks domain depth. Many senior leaders don't have deep cybersecurity or IT backgrounds, which makes it difficult for them to set a clear product vision, read where the market is heading, or chart a credible path to get there. This was supposed to be a cyber company, but outside of the MDR team, that expertise is thin at the top. Good ideas die quietly. I brought forward multiple product ideas that were blocked repeatedly with the rationale that the company is "device-centric, not user-centric." That framing felt disconnected from what the market actually demands. Priorities shift without communication. Strategic direction changed several times during my tenure, but product was rarely looped in ahead of those shifts. I'd learn about new priorities after the fact, with no context on why things changed. Attrition goes unaddressed. There were multiple rounds of quiet layoffs and a steady stream of voluntary departures. Leadership never paused to examine why people were leaving or to share any explanation with the remaining team. The expectation was simply to carry on as if nothing had happened. Bottom line: A challenging culture, unclear leadership direction, and a product that isn't showing up on shortlists where competitors are winning deals. I'd encourage prospective candidates to ask hard questions before joining.