Nice colleagues and innovative projects but poor company culture with blame and mistrust towards people - Avis employé Scrum Master Quant Network

3,0
23 août 2022
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Innovative start-up environment, interesting Crypto projects, friendly, nice and intelligent colleagues.

Inconvénients

Quant seems to be a typical Start-up, with a fast paced environment and an innovative product in the emerging cryptocurrency world. During my time at Quant (1 year), quite a few changes occurred, be it teams changing members, teams ceasing to exist, changes in product direction and vision, projects pausing and or changing drastically, people being shared between multiple teams. Although change is welcome in Agile and expected to see within a start-up environment that evolves dynamically, I felt that executing the changes was not thought through thoroughly, and that the impact of some of these changes to people was not considered much. In my experience at Quant, when things went well, everyone was happy and no one was in trouble. When things didn’t go to plan, elements of blame started to appear, and the focus was on individuals rather than at team level as well as on providing individuals with the support the need. The management promoted the idea of the responsibility sitting mainly with individuals, rather than with teams where opportunities for improvement and support are explored. As an Agile expert, I was the leader for quite a few teams myself (up to five at some point), and because of management being unhappy with a particular area, I was removed from a team and informed via Slack about it. I was after a while made redundant because of not having experience at a particular aspect of the work; my proposal to get training and support, so I can improve, was rejected. I was then asked to go on garden leave till my last day of employment, which happened with other people within the company as well, after an agreement to leave was made. A former employee’s access to everything was revoked immediately, when they announced their resignation, and after the company discovered that they will be joining a competitor company. This lady, because of this, didn’t get the chance to say goodbye to people, and I saw her coming to collect her belongings, after a meeting with management, in tears. In my case, as well as in other cases, no leaving due was arranged, nor a card was given as a sign of appreciation towards people working at and contributing to the company. To me, it felt like individuals were not trusted, and were unfortunately perceived as threats and unimportant, as soon as they didn’t seemed useful anymore.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Quant Network

1,0
5 janv. 2024
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

The best of the company is the people. Even though we are treated like slaves, we are committed to our job

Inconvénients

If you want to work in a moody environment, this is your place. Decisions referred to employees are made based on unilateral and mood of the two owners

1
1,0
16 févr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

- Interesting industry exposure and technically challenging projects. - Opportunity to collaborate with international teams. - I was very lucky to work with a Product Owner (who was quite new to the company), but who was very dedicated and tried to keep standards high, despite challenges. She offered consistent support and mentoring during my time there.

Inconvénients

- Perceived decline in culture recently, with more negativity, silo behavior, and internal politics. - Support often depended heavily on individual initiative rather than consistent organizational backing. - Concerns around transparency in promotions, hiring decisions, and compensation progression. - Increasing burnout risk due to workload imbalance and unclear expectations. - Frequent reliance on short-term outsourced hires, which sometimes created continuity and quality challenges for teams. - Limited structured HR presence, making people management, feedback, and recognition feel inconsistent. - Extra initiative (mentoring new hires, improving processes, helping recruitment) doesn’t always seem formally acknowledged. - Communication can feel transactional rather than empathetic, affecting morale.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout