Organisation très bien gérée qui exaltait la gestion des risques, mais finalement trop tolérante envers les intimidateurs et les harceleurs sexuels. - Avis employé Investment Banking Managing Director Santander

4,0
29 mai 2023
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

La structure de gestion des risques et la gouvernance sont par excellence.

Inconvénients

Encore trop tolérant vis-à-vis des très mauvais comportements des « star execs » ; des gens qui n'auraient pas duré une journée chez JPM, Barclays ou Citibank à cause d'intimidation ou de harcèlement sexuel, par exemple. La banque paie plutôt les femmes sur les femmes et leur fait signer des NDA plutôt que de traiter avec les coupables. Difficile de briser les rangs de la suite C si ce n'est un homme espagnol. Les systèmes de gestion des risques sont déplorables, ont dû gérer de nombreux risques via des feuilles de calcul. très onéreux et presque impossible à rationaliser

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Santander

5,0
5 mars 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Bonus based on performance. The company always put on events for the employees. Great work environment

Inconvénients

Work long days. And sometimes weekends. Not much room for growth

1,0
18 mars 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Some talented coworkers doing their best despite the environment.

Inconvénients

My experience at Santander was defined by constant confusion, poor leadership, and a complete lack of strategic clarity. Information from management is frequently unclear, contradictory, or changes with little to no explanation. Priorities shift so often that it becomes nearly impossible to execute meaningful work or see projects through to completion. Long‑running initiatives are regularly abandoned midway, only to pivot toward new “urgent” goals that are later changed again. This creates an environment of perpetual chaos rather than progress. There is little transparency around decision‑making, and employees are left to deal with the fallout of constantly moving targets. Compensation is underwhelming compared to the demands and stress of the role. Leadership at the middle‑management level can be particularly challenging, with some managers creating an unnecessarily hostile or dismissive work environment instead of providing support or direction. Overall, the culture feels reactive rather than strategic, with a heavy emphasis on optics over actual outcomes. If you are looking for stability, clear communication, or leadership that empowers teams, you will likely be disappointed. Cons: Disorganized leadership, constantly shifting priorities, poor communication, low compensation, stressful culture.

1
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout