Avantages
Coworkers were solid hard working people.
Inconvénients
The environment was overwhelmingly stressful, with a culture that prioritized speed over quality. Projects were frequently pushed out prematurely despite clear warnings from the team that they weren’t ready. Leadership valued meeting deadlines over delivering a functional product, leaving employees frustrated and overworked. If you told management something they didn’t want to hear, they would become visibly upset. A common conversation among employees was, “How are you dealing with the stress?” Employees regularly voiced concerns about excessive workloads and management’s disregard for work-life balance. It wasn’t uncommon for team members to have multiple projects dumped on them with no consideration for their existing responsibilities. East Coast employees, in particular, were often contacted late at night or on weekends, as if boundaries didn’t exist. One of the most frustrating aspects of working here was the company’s empty emphasis on being “open and honest.” In practice, it felt more like “closed and vague.” Leadership routinely withheld information and made confusing, last-minute decisions, leaving employees in the dark. During the holidays and right before bonuses, they laid off 25% of their workforce after a mass hiring spree just a few months earlier. That’s outright cold and inept leadership. I wouldn’t recommend working here.