Growing, changing company with good opportunity. - Avis employé Operations Infor

4,0
16 janv. 2014
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

This company is in a growth and reimaging phase, working to position itself as a player in a number of different software areas. The management team is strong. There is a very strong international component of the company that makes it much less US centric. Due to the growth there is opportunity for advancement.

Inconvénients

As the company is reshaped from a lot of small acquisitions to a larger more cohesive software provider there is a loss of the small company feel. The management seems to be able to envision a different future, but the day to day employees are dealing with the here and now and are often not in sync. Investment in Change Management and communications to keep everyone marching to the same drum would be a great help.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Infor

5,0
5 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great company to work for. Flexible. Great mentors and access to leadership.

Inconvénients

Leadership changes frequently Infor has a few "focus" industries - its best to be in one of those lines of business if you want to maximize sales compensation.

avatar
Réponse de Infor
4w
Thank you for your review. We’re delighted to hear about your positive experience with us.​ ​ We are the forefront of industry trends and emerging technologies, ensuring our people constantly have new opportunities to learn, grow, and accelerate their careers. ​
3,0
22 mai 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

I like working at Infor. I’ve been here for roughly five years. I enjoy the work, believe in the product, and genuinely like the people I work with and for.

Inconvénients

There has recently been a very strong “AI-first” push across the company. To be clear, I understand the value. AI absolutely can streamline operations and free people up to focus on higher-value work. Used correctly, it’s useful. The problem is that there does not appear to be a clear or consistently enforced policy around what constitutes appropriate use versus misuse or outright abuse. There should be better guidance around where AI helps productivity, where it introduces risk (especially around company information being entered into public tools), and where the line is between use and replacement of basic job responsibilities. For example, I recently had a coworker explain that they created AI automation to read and manage their emails so they rarely have to review or respond themselves, while acknowledging things are likely missed. The same person records meetings for transcripts, leaves their laptop during the call, then relies on AI afterward to summarize what happened. At a certain point, it raises a legitimate question: are we using AI to improve productivity, or are we using it to avoid participating in the job altogether? Right now, reactions internally seem split. Some employees view this as a serious abuse of the technology, while others appear fully on board with it. That disconnect alone suggests the company needs clearer expectations and policy guidance. AI should support human judgment and critical thinking. Not eliminate the need for employees to engage in their work entirely. And how does the company determine when that is being done?

avatar
Réponse de Infor
3w
At this time of change, growth, and continuous improvement, our employees are encouraged to speak up if they see an opportunity to make our ways of working better. Please send your feedback to myfeedback@infor.com so we can better understand your concern.
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout