RadPharm or CoreLab Partners (as its now called) great oppertunity to the newly graduated - Avis employé Quality Auditor CoreLab Partners

3,0
21 févr. 2011
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

RadPharm (or CoreLab Partners as its no called) is a young work environment full of people just out of college and getting into the working world. It represents a great opportunity to work in the industry without being buried with bureaucracy. The benefits package isn’t bad with 20 days of PTO to start medical and Dental they are competitive with larger companies.

Inconvénients

Advancement is more about who you know then what skills you possess or your work ethic. Managers suffer from a lack of experience, business knowledge, and the ability to lead. Management and supervisors are constantly pushing responsibility and blame on to those who report to them for fear of their job.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur CoreLab Partners

5,0
14 oct. 2013
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Good restaurants in the area

Inconvénients

You can apply at one of those restaurants after their quarterly layoffs

1
2,0
4 déc. 2011
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Young company. Laxed corporate environment. Fast promotions. Relatively easy scope of work. Networking opportunities to Big Pharma. Benefits are ok. Vacation time is never an issue.

Inconvénients

High turnover results in inexperienced employees at each position throughout the company. Most managers lack managerial skills and are too overwhelmed to care about employees. Senior management is too young and immature. Cliques are formed rather than quickly. Long hours are expected and are the norm, not the exception. Promotions are more about who you know than qualifications and if the person is ready for the position. Poor pay for amount of studies/tasks responsible at every level except entry level. Senior management does not care if you are overwhelmed they'll just keep on giving more work even if quality of work suffers then question why work suffers. Poor training for new roles/systems. Extremely poor technology, instead of outsourcing to experts the company relies on quick fixes from internal IS department. Poor integration between systems. Directors of departments point fingers rather than work as a team to fix issues. Low company morale. Sense that the company is not doing well and is always about to go under without any updates on progress.

Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout