Psychologically damaging environment - Avis employé Employé (anonyme) Selective Insurance

1,0
28 juil. 2020
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

None. Seriously, there are no pros.

Inconvénients

This was the most psychologically abusive environment I've ever worked in. Full of bullies, most of whom are management, zero emotional intelligence, no empathy, retaliatory behavior, work you to the bone for next to no respect or appreciation. Management will flat out target someone and lie about things, all the while hypocritically doing the very things they accuse people of. No one cares about you here. You're just a piece of meat. It was like being in the Twilight Zone and they management team is egotistical and oblivious, thinking they are the best people ever and that selective is the best place. Couldn't be farther from the truth. Toxic environment through and through.

avatar
Réponse de Selective Insurance
5y
It sounds like the short time you spent with us wasn't the experience we aim to create for our people. We will share your comments with management for review. Best of luck to you in your future endeavors.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Selective Insurance

5,0
17 avr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Inconvénients

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Inconvénients

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout