Good work life balance - Avis employé Systems Engineer Veeam Software

3,0
22 févr. 2023
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Worklife balance and salary is adequate

Inconvénients

Legacy management style and culture

avatar
Réponse de Veeam Software
3y
Thank you for your input on our work-life balance and Compensation+Benefits at our Systems Engineer team! As we grow our global team to more than 5000 Veeamers all over the world, we are refining our processes and workflows to ensure efficiency and keep Veeam Speed a part of our culture.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur Veeam Software

5,0
17 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

solid coworkers good product market fit

Inconvénients

already a very large company?

avatar
Réponse de Veeam Software
6d
Thank you for sharing your experience! We're happy to hear you've connected with great colleagues -building strong teams is something we take seriously. Veeam has grown significantly in the last years, which can take some getting used to, but we work hard to maintain the collaborative spirit. Welcome aboard, and we hope the first year is just the beginning of a great journey here.
2,0
3 févr. 2026
Employé (anonyme)
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Pay is good as well as benefits.

Inconvénients

Poor organizational structure and lack of clarity: Roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines were confusing. This made collaboration and accountability very difficult. Nepotism and favoritism in leadership: Upper management heavily favored hiring and promoting people from their previous companies the "buddy system". Loyalty to personal networks appeared to matter more than competence or performance, which created cliques and made nonconnected employees feel like outsiders. Hypocritical company culture: Leadership frequently talked about "employee matters" values, strong culture, and employee well being, but in practice these were not reflected in actions. Layoffs, heavy workloads after staff reductions, and a focus on looking good on paper undermined any real trust. Frequent layoffs and job insecurity: Multiple rounds of layoffs created constant uncertainty. Remaining employees were expected to absorb significantly more work with fewer resources and little recognition or support. Heavy favoritism toward offshoring and lower cost international employees: Upper management strongly preferred hiring or retaining talent in countries with significantly lower cost of living because their lower salaries made departmental budgets and headcount metrics look better on paper. This resulted in U.S. based employees being disproportionately targeted in layoffs or overlooked for retention/promotion.

6
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout