J'ai postulé via un établissement d'enseignement supérieur ou universitaire. Le processus a pris 1 jour. J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic (Madison, WI) en nov. 2014
Entretien
I got the onsite request 1 week after I finished the online assignment. The process is simple, no technical question. First they give a short instruction on their company and products, then we have a chance to ask an engineer kinds of questions. Next there were two 1 to 1 talk. They'll let you talk about the things on your resume. After that another person came in and asked me a question, non-technical. This is what I did in the morning. After lunch they gave us a tour of the campus, it quite interesting. At last there were a talking to a HR.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Image a situation that a patient make a call to the hospital, the person who answer the call should allocate a doctor to the patient. If this guy leaves for some reason, how could the doctor find the patient?
J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.
