Les candidats postulant à un poste comme Software Developer chez Epic attribuent un niveau de difficulté de 4 sur 5 (5 étant le niveau de difficulté le plus élevé) à leur expérience d’entretien et sont 100 % à l’évaluer comme positive. À titre de comparaison, la moyenne pour l’ensemble de l’entreprise est de 100 % d’avis positifs, d’après les évaluations Glassdoor.
D’après 1 entretiens Glassdoor, les étapes typiques du processus d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Software Developer chez Epic incluent :
Test de personnalité: 25 %
Test des compétences: 25 %
Test de QI/d’intelligence: 25 %
Entretien téléphonique: 25 %
Voici les rôles les plus recherchés pour les rapports d’entretien -
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic
Entretien
I spent over four hours on an online proctored test with a two minute speed section that doesn't show anywhere how much time you have left (just automatically exits you out of the section when time's up), a math section that was filled with either SAT math type questions or completely random logic riddles, and then a technical section that tests you on some made up programming language, then finally the best part, a coding section with 4 Leetcode medium-ish questions without any test cases, stdout, or linting like most other code assessment services give you, only syntax highlighting. You basically are doing these pretty difficult coding questions in Microsoft Word, so have fun!
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
An apple is 40 cents, a banana is 60 cents, and a grapefruit is 80 cents. What is the price of a pear?
J'ai passé un entretien chez Epic (San Francisco, CA)
Entretien
Medium level leetcode and then a very basic system design question as a final round interview. Overall, smooth and simple process. Only one technical and it was the first one.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
How would you design a system to minimize wait time at a health care center?
First round is a thirty minute phone call with one of their developers. The other part of the first round is a three hour exam with IQ test style logic questions and coding questions.
[OA] OA was fair. Programming part are leetcode easy and easy-mediums, straightforward simulation, backtracking, dfs, strings, etc. No DP/graphs but ymmv.
[Final interview] (Case Study) I think the interviewer came up with their own prompt. It's mostly discussion-based, with a virtual white board. It's not too technical. I'm guessing its testing your communication/logical reasoning than system design skills. (Pair programming) 1 question, same format as the OA on the same platform, leetcode easy.
[Overall] Technical difficulty isn't bad. Interviewers who are current software devs seemed friendly. Had a good experience, yet got rejected.