3y
Thanks for your feedback. I believe that in a hiring process having the conclusion that some candidates are better suited to the position and we progress with them to a next round instead of you is a quiet regular outcome and a valid response. With respect, I hard to see how a conclusion like this can be "irrelevant" in a hiring process? You might feel you are an excellent fit for the position, the hiring company might judge it otherwise. Your profile was matching the job description, and we had a good first interview, then we evaluated all interviews in the first round and you did not make the cut. Most other candidates that our CEO interviewed had much longer experience as a System Administrator compared to you. We advertised the position again as we could not hire any of the candidates we progressed into the second round with. There is nothing more to this story even though you seem to be insinuating it in your review.
Also, to address your concerns about contracting - if you look into it, this is not just regular practice, but an inevitable reality of running a fully distributed small business that has colleagues around the world. Hundreds, if not thousands of remote-first companies operate this way fully or partially. It's not feasible to set up companies and hire people in all jurisdiction you employ people in. All of our colleagues work with us in a similar setup and most of us have been with the company for 3+ years. This is just normal practice.