Questions d'entretien chez LED Group ROBUS

First interview was mainly around personality fit and hobbies etc and some paid marketing ads questions. Second stage is a narrowly focused personality test which basically asked you to, for example, choose between hard working and trustworthiness as your dominant attribute, strange test. I completed the personality test and heard nothing back even after agreeing a provisional date for an in person interview, a simple 'not the right fit' feedback was given to my recruiter, which left me with very poor taste about the company and my interviewer who seemed incompetent throughout the interview, in my opinion, and was predominantly focused on hiring someone who can have the "craic" and socialise with team members which is great but left an impression that it's not a serious role and skillset/experience came secondary. It would be a great interview process for a 'book club get together' or 'new friends social club'. Interviewer feedback takes two minutes, there's no excuse, whole experience came down to laziness and incompetence on their part in my opinion. Gladly avoided.

This company was about a 3/5 in relation to the interview process, however it was quite long, drawn out, and unpredictable. There were 4 stages to this process which I felt was too long and some stages were completely unnecessary such as a very unhelpful PPA assessment which the recruitment team thought would show how a person works, I think is deceiving to base a person on this type of assessment. One of the stages involved a dreaded brief to complete which should be cut from any interview process, as ones experience and portfolio is what recruiters need to go off and not make candidates waste time by doing free work. You were asked to present your design brief and was asked many questions which was not communicated to candidates prior to the interview. There were a few personal questions asked which was inappropriate and there was confusion based on telling a candidate they had good experience, to tell the candidate they didn't have enough experience which caused a sense of scepticism.