The interview process included an initial HR screening, followed by three stages of technical interviews, and concluded with a final call with the VP of Engineering. The HR screening was a basic 30-minute conversation with a recruiter who was very helpful and kept me informed throughout the entire process. The technical interviews were split into three parts: Technical Assessment: This stage was a 1.5-hour session with two engineers. The focus was mainly on questions about my experiences, Python, databases, and some behavioral questions. Live Coding: The next stage was a live coding session with two different engineers, lasting 1.5 hours. The task involved building an endpoint to interact with an external service. System Design: This interview lasted for 2 hours and involved designing a system similar to Google Analytics with two more engineers. The final step was a call with the VP of Engineering, which focused on my motivations and experiences. Unfortunately, I was rejected at this stage with a generic template response and no feedback. Overall, the engineers I met up to the system design interview were very intelligent, friendly, and seemed like great potential colleagues. However, the interview process felt overly lengthy for a company of this size, and the lack of specific feedback after the final stage was disappointing. Additionally, candidates do not apply for specific teams; team assignments are made only if an offer is extended. This approach does not allow candidates to ask any team-specific questions beforehand, which could be a drawback.