I recently had an interview experience with this company as an intermediary for another one that I believe is important to share. Despite receiving a very last-minute notice, I made it a priority to be available and engaged for the discussion, especially given the opportunity to speak directly with the CEO of RedValley's client. My eagerness to participate in this process, however, was met with a disappointing turn of events. During our conversation, the CEO remarked on my strong accent, noting that while my skills and English proficiency were apparent, my accent was a concern. As a multilingual professional fluent in four languages, I value the richness that linguistic diversity brings to any role. However, the emphasis on my accent rather than my professional qualifications was not only disheartening but felt discriminatory. It's essential for companies to appreciate the diverse talents and cultural backgrounds that candidates bring to the table. If there is a preference for native English speakers, this should be transparently communicated in the job criteria. Moreover, seeking talent in regions like Latin America with the expectation of lower compensation, coupled with the demand for native-level English proficiency without an accent, is unrealistic and culturally insensitive. This experience, particularly after rearranging my schedule to accommodate the last-minute interview, has been enlightening. I hope that by sharing this, the company will reconsider its hiring practices and attitudes towards diversity. Embracing an inclusive environment where skills and experience are valued over superficial attributes such as accents is crucial for any forward-thinking organization. Moreover, is worth to mention that the recruiter just ghosted me, no feedback, no support, no nothing.