The irony of interviewing at an 'IQ' company is that the front-line recruiter was completely disengaged, mentally somewhere else, and had less technical fluency than a basic GPT-2 model running on a dead battery. They did a fantastic job reading a rigid script, but the moment the conversation shifted to actual architectural depth, her system completely crashed. During the call, I offered standard enterprise feedback regarding the long-term scalability of visual, UI-driven automation tools (Make/n8n) versus robust code environments (Cursor/Claude Code). This structural nuance complete overload for her. If you deviate from the script or provide any actual engineering substance that isn't explicitly written on her prompt sheet, then expect the pipeline to get blown up. Got the generic automated rejection a few days later. If you actually know how to build at scale, be prepared for a distracted gatekeeper who is entirely out of their depth in the modern AI/automation space.