J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez SeatGeek (New York, NY) en oct. 2022
Entretien
Online technical assessment, reviewing source code to identify vulnerabilities. Create basic report explaining all vulnerabilities, impact, how to fix. Recruiter screening call after, then 2.5 hours of interviews. Technical call with senior appsec engineer, reverse interview, technical interview with appsec manager. Everyone I met with was extremely friendly, highly positive interview experience.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
Review source code of application, explain vulnerabilities found.
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez SeatGeek en sept. 2022
Entretien
The interview process is mediocre at best there is a test after which the screening round is taken. Which should actually be the other way around. Moreover, I was rejected after completing the assessment and qualifying for the next round. Got rejected solely on the basis of the position getting filled, even without an interview opportunity.
Questions d'entretien [1]
Question 1
1. First round was a Vulnerable Web Application Challenge. The time allotted for the round was 1 week and was a take-home test. Along with exploiting the application, a report had to be created for the challenge. 2. For the next round the interview got scheduled but the recruiter informed me that the position has already been filled.
