This role or a version of it has been posted for 4+years. Leadership and hiring do not know what they want ..."could be a CMO or a VP or a Director, depends what we find" - Red Flag. Process is one-sided and asks way too much of an executive with deep expertise and gives no opportunity for interviewee to ask questions. Before an initial phone call, I was presented with more than 20 questions (with an equal number of sub-questions) via email. These were all marketing basics that were tactical in nature and thus not representing a strategic marketing executive role - Red Flag. After those questions, and within the same email, you're asked if you will complete a 1-3 year strategic plan, a SWOT analysis, and proctored assessments - Red Flag. To be clear, I said "NO" to a 1-3 year strategic plan and SWOT analysis. My time is too valuable to waste on this but I had a morbid curiosity to continue to see how things would play out - who knows, maybe they would surprise me? Upon speaking with the interviewer (after them being 15+ minutes late for calls or last minute reschedules because they are "so busy"), be prepared to listen and not speak. They talk in circles (because they have no idea what they are looking for) and leave no time for your questions - Red Flag. If you move forward after this, as I did, be prepared for 3+ hours of assessments where you will share your screen so they can to "make sure you're not cheating" - Red Flag. If you do make their short list, they will drag you along for months thinking you're moving forward through their process, which is being presented during Saturday morning leadership meetings. Saturday? Red Flag. Overall assessment: steer clear of this organization. They are unorganized and unable to clearly articulate what they want in executive leadership. Not worth the investment of time and subject matter expertise. Loads of red flags and clear trust issues as noted in their job posting: "Please do not apply if your ethics are not beyond reproach."