Giant DayCare for Adults - Avis employé Manager LinkedIn

1,0
24 janv. 2019
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

Great Food, Health Insurance OK,

Inconvénients

Everything, one of the worst companies I have ever worked for. The employees are some of the worst I have ever had to deal with. They are arrogant, self-centered and believe the world owes them everything. Jeff is like a sheep herder and everyone just follows along. The company all hands is like the Jim Jones just getting everyone to drink the cool-aid. Management is a joke and most directors don't know what they are doing or even how to do their own jobs. The work environment is great if you like to sit next to kids shooting nerf guns all day and more worried about the next party than doing their work. Project managers are a JOKE!!!!! If you like to say to your mangers that they are the greatest then you get promoted. Almost half the employees are just not needed but since so many barely work they just hire and hire to make up. Management supports this child like environment as it gives the the feeling of power and doing good. sad thing is they foster an environment of hate and discontent among the real workers. Turn-over is very high even at top management levels. This is a very political in its daily culture. You either are a complete yes person are you go no-where very fast. They have no clue on how to run a company that is professional or how to spend wisely. This is also a very wasteful company.

Découvrez plus d’avis sur LinkedIn

5,0
28 mai 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

great company! highly recommend working there

Inconvénients

there are no cons that

3,0
21 févr. 2026
Recommande
Approbation du PDG
Perspective commerciale

Avantages

-Control your schedule -Office environment is great -Teammates are nice and helpful

Inconvénients

-Customer Success metrics lack clear ownership and actionable levers. Many CSMs do not have direct control over the outcomes they are measured against, and success narratives are often based on isolated or non-replicable examples rather than scalable processes. -Microsoft’s increased influence over LinkedIn has led to tighter promotion structures and more limited compensation growth pathways. -Product value within the LTS portfolio is inconsistent. LinkedIn Learning struggles with perceived differentiation and impact, while Recruiter’s market position relies heavily on legacy dominance rather than clear ongoing innovation or customer value expansion. -Metric design and performance management frameworks were created without a strong operational understanding of the CSM role, resulting in accountability for outcomes that CSMs cannot directly influence. -While many CSMs share these concerns, there is limited upward feedback or structured challenge to leadership regarding metric design and role effectiveness, which limits opportunities for meaningful reform. They prefer to lick the boots of senior leaders rather than tell AV and his team how they actually feel and see progress to better, more impactful metrics. For individuals who are comfortable with high call volumes (10+ customer interactions per week) and performance metrics that are influenced significantly by external factors rather than direct role ownership, LinkedIn LTS Customer Success can be a suitable environment.

3
Voir les avis par: Utile|Évaluation|Date|Tout