The interview process had 6 parts: 1/ a screen phone call with a recruiter to talk about motivations, discuss the role and set anchors for the compensation 2/ a tech phone call with the team, to discuss specifics of the position, describe my experience and ask more technical questions 3/ a kaggle-like challenge, that I needed to complete in 10 hours (but I was given it for a week). You are not really judged on the result on the leaderboard, but really on the quality of your code, your ideas for improvement, and the questions you asked yourself, and I really felt that because my submission was just above the baseline and far from the top of the leaderboard. 4/ a 1-hour discussion with the tech team on your code and your ideas for improvement 5/ a 45-minute presentation of some work you did (not necessarily related to the position) and 15 minutes of questions 6/ an interview with a science VP to discuss core motivations and ask questions about the company Overall I felt really valued as a candidate during the interview process, and I know I had the chance to showcase my skills fairly. I also had a really good connection with the team, and the recruiter.

The interview process was really smooth. The interviews were technically challenging but the interviewers were actively listening and trying to make you give the best version of you. Everyone I met in the interview process was really smart and kind.