I was shown around the campus, then taken into a conference room where I met, individually, with multiple employees. The first person to interview me came in with an attitude from the start. They tried to belittle me multiple times, but were caught off guard when I explained a better approach to their methodologies in security. The person would back-pedal in their argument and then tried another avenue to prove me wrong. Each time I explained a better way to approach a problem, which one of the solutions I explained, the person wrote down and was going to start working on implementing that security measure. Again, the first person was extremely unpleasant and argumentative. The second individual had nothing to do with security and seemed to be filling the time gaps. The third person was the direct report for the position, who seemed inconvenienced and disinterested as soon as he walked into the room. He didn't ask a single question and had very vague answers to my questions. I was supposed to meet with a fourth person, but never got the chance. Aside from the confrontations from the first person, I felt strong about my candidacy and even provided excellent solutions to security issues they were facing. For a company that pushes its culture to be innovation, collaborative, and forward-thinking, the interview proved to be the opposite. I have a strong feeling that the first person I met with disliked me from the start. I saw them directly talking to the direct report right before I interviewed with him, which more than likely didn't go in my favor. Honestly, I've never left an interview more infuriated than I did with Red Ventures. The organization has great potential (as far as security), but needs strong, innovative direction.