Aller au contenuAller au pied de page
  • Emplois
  • Entreprises
  • Salaires
  • Pour les employeurs

      Boostez votre carrière

      Découvrez votre salaire potentiel, décrochez des emplois de rêve et partagez vos témoignages de manière anonyme.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Criteo

      Employeur impliqué

      À propos
      Avis
      Salaires et avantages
      Emplois
      Entretiens
      Entretiens
      Recherches associées: Avis sur Criteo | Offres d’emploi chez Criteo | Salaires chez Criteo | Avantages sociaux chez Criteo
      Entretiens chez CriteoEntretiens d’embauche pour Team Lead chez CriteoEntretien chez Criteo


      Glassdoor

      • À propos
      • Récompenses
      • Blog
      • Nous contacter
      • Guides

      Employeurs

      • Compte employeur gratuit
      • Centre employeur
      • Blog pour les employeurs

      Informations

      • Aide
      • Règles de la communauté
      • Conditions d'utilisation
      • Confidentialité et choix publicitaires
      • Ne pas vendre ni partager mes informations
      • Outil de consentement aux cookies

      Travailler avec nous

      • Annonceurs
      • Carrières
      Télécharger l'application

      • Parcourir par :
      • Entreprises
      • Emplois
      • Lieux

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. « Glassdoor », son logo, « Worklife Pro » et « Bowls » sont des marques déposées de Glassdoor LLC.

      Entreprises suivies

      Tenez-vous au courant des dernières opportunités et profitez de conseils d’initiés en suivant les entreprises de vos rêves.

      Recherche d’emplois

      Obtenez des recommandations et des mises à jour personnalisées en démarrant vos recherches.

      Entretien pour Team Lead

      17 juin 2025
      Employé (anonyme)
      Barcelone
      Offre acceptée
      Expérience positive
      Entretien difficile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Criteo (Barcelone) en janv. 2025

      Entretien

      1.Call with HR 2.Interview with the Hiring Manager (60 minutes) 3.Technical Assessment (90 minutes) A pair programming session divided into two parts: a. Code Review Exercise (30 minutes) b. System Design Exercise (60 minutes) 4.Collaboration Discussion (90 minutes)

      Questions d'entretien [1]

      Question 1

      Behavioral questions, code correction and product mindset
      Répondre à cette question

      Autres retours d’entretien d’embauche pour un poste comme Team Lead chez Criteo

      Entretien pour Team Lead

      22 févr. 2025
      Candidat à l'entretien anonyme
      Barcelone
      Offre refusée
      Expérience négative
      Entretien facile

      Candidature

      J'ai postulé via une autre source. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Criteo (Barcelone) en févr. 2025

      Entretien

      Unprofessional Hiring Process, Poor Management & Lack of Transparency Pros: Competitive salary and benefits package (at first). Well-known company with interesting projects. Cons: Broken commitments & unreliable hiring process: This is not the first time I’ve experienced serious unprofessionalism from this company. Previously, after completing a rigorous interview process and signing a written offer, they withdrew it due to internal conflicts—showing a complete disregard for my time, effort, and trust. Now, after reconsidering me for the same position, the process was once again mishandled. Misleading and disorganized hiring approach: I was put in what was presented as a casual team discussion—only to later find out it was actually a formal interview. This was never communicated to me, making the process unclear and deceptive. Unstructured decision-making: After discussing salary and being told they wanted to offer me the position, I was unexpectedly rejected because “the team didn’t feel the click.” If that was the deciding factor, why proceed with salary negotiations in the first place? This kind of last-minute backtracking is highly unprofessional. Lack of leadership in hiring decisions: In any serious company, leadership roles—especially Team Lead positions—are decided by management, not left entirely to a team that may lack experience in assessing leadership qualities. It is unheard of to let a group of engineers, some with far less experience than me, make the final call without proper oversight. Chaotic internal management & poor communication: The hiring process has been plagued by delays, unclear messaging, and shifting expectations. At no point was I given a clear understanding of what to expect, and even when issues arose, they were never communicated transparently. Disrespect for candidates: Twice now, this company has wasted my time with unclear, unprofessional hiring practices. Rescinding a signed offer was already a huge red flag. But even when reconsidering me for the role, they failed to provide a fair and structured evaluation process. Advice to Management: Fix your internal conflicts and align your hiring strategy before engaging candidates. A signed offer should be a firm commitment, not something to be withdrawn due to disorganization. Ensure transparency in the interview process. Candidates should be fully aware when they are being formally assessed. Make leadership hiring decisions at the management level. Allowing an engineering team to choose their own Team Lead without oversight results in biased and unprofessional decision-making. Respect candidates’ time and effort. If you’re not serious about hiring, don’t waste people’s time with misleading processes. Twice now, I’ve experienced an unprofessional and chaotic hiring process with this company. I would strongly advise against engaging with them unless you are prepared for poor communication, shifting expectations, and a complete lack of accountability from management.