J'ai postulé via la recommandation d'un employé. Le processus a pris 3 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (Mountain View, CA) en mai 2008
Entretien
I had two brief interviews with Google's legal department. The first one was a pre-screen with a recruiter, and it lasted about 30 minutes. The recruiter was very nice, asked a lot of substantive questions and scheduled the next round to interview with someone more senior in the department. I had a quick phone screen wiht that person. It was a very rushed interview and seemed immediately obvious that I did not have the experience this particular person was hoping I would have (and which I never claimed to have had, either in person or on my resume). I never heard from them again. Many of my friends and colleagues have interviewed at Google, to varying degrees of success, and I am told that it's an excruciating process. My impression is that they didn't have a clear idea of what kind of experience they were looking for for this particular role, and it had been a posting that had been up for a very long time, which indicates that there is disagreement on what the candidate profile should look like.
J'ai postulé en ligne. J'ai passé un entretien chez Google
Entretien
First call was w/recruiter. Then after an in-person interview with several people, I had several separate calls w/individuals in different departments at Google. Great interviews with great people, but I was never told I was out of the running until I called the recruiter after not hearing for several weeks.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 2 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (Mountain View, CA) en janv. 2014
Entretien
Phone interview with recruiter followed by in person interview on-site with team. Initially interviewed with a New York team, found out quickly that my skills didn't match theirs and was referred to another team where I ultimately ended up spending the summer.
J'ai postulé en ligne. Le processus a pris 4 semaines. J'ai passé un entretien chez Google (Mountain View, CA) en sept. 2011
Entretien
They are very into skills. They quizzed me on the phone in one of my 3 phone screens about random knowledge. Eg., they asked me acronyms to see if I knew what they stood for. Very quick stuff so I couldn't look it up on the internet. But very pedantic. Then, on site, they gave me a bunch of hypos - each meeting had 2 people who worked there - and one would ask the question and the other would write down comments on the laptop. Very much had the feel of an oral exam. Very skills/knowledge oriented and little to no focus on cultural fit.