J'ai postulé via un établissement d'enseignement supérieur ou universitaire. Le processus a pris 1 jour. J'ai passé un entretien chez EY (Gurgaon, Haryana) en janv. 2015
Entretien
EY Risk Advisory services
There were 2 rounds .1st with the team 'manager' , and the next with the partner .
In the first round, I was asked about my prior work-ex (in IT sector) .I was then asked about what risks could be expected in a typical procurement process .Told him about supplier risk, quality ,lead time ,etc. Also asked on risks in a NBFC I had mentioned in my resume .I'd worked on Oracle ERP.Was asked whether I knew SAP .Replied in the negative .
The partner round was a test of mental toughness and ability to work under pressure, besides being a technical one .
Q. Which company is at the top in Fortune 500 list ?What is its turnover ?
Q. Which Indian companies are there in Fortune 500 ?
Q. What is the typical cost structure of a tech company ?
A. HR cost .They have the billing rates & no. of people as cost drivers .
Q. Any other ?
A. Replied R&D .Tried to justify by saying that although products by Indian tech companies like Infosys (Finacle) were made quite some time ago, R&D has to be incurred to continuously patch it .
Q. How will you reduce costs in such a firm ?
Reduce bench strength, poor performers, leased offices rather than on purchased land, use of solution accelerators,etc .
Questions d'entretien [2]
Question 1
How will you detect payroll fraud for a company ?You can have any data you like .
Appel téléphonique bref, RH posait des questions comme un robot en lisant sa liste de questions. Aucune information donnée sur le poste ou sur le process. Je n'ai pas recu de retour par mail pendant 5 mois avant de recevoir un refus générique.
Lengthy interview with many different stages. Video and oaychometric not going very far. Overall could be quicker. Not surw what else to say. Interviwwee vritually and oohyiacially. No offer recieved.
Il s'agit d'un processus de recrutement en trois temps : un entretien avec un manager, un cas pratique relatif au secteur public avec un directeur, puis un entretien avec un associé.